I'm Brian A. Maloney and I approve this message.Cue the music!
You know, that deep bass, I'm about to grow a tail in my shorts, suspenseful music that make you feel like dropping a deuce on the spot?!
Cue it up.....
It's about to get nuclear, or is nukelar, or is nuc......
Oh #$% it all....
Just cue the music......
Today, the House of Representatives will vote on a measure to override President Bush's veto of SCHIP (which is a massive government-subsidized health insurance entitlement expansion plan). I agree with the Democrats on one thing: This is indeed a "defining moment."
The left-wing elite is in high dudgeon over conservatives who have dared to question the wisdom of extending SCHIP to middle-class families, adults and even illegal aliens to the tune of $35 billion -- funding dependent on saddling millions of smokers with regressive taxes and maintaining their nicotine addictions.
Liberal columnists have called people like me (as well as way more famous people than me) "meanies and hypocrites" (you know that whole compassionate conservative moniker people like to throw around right now) who are "sliming" children. Even political stalwarts such as Joy Behar took their pot shots to condemn people like me as a "selfish b------." Why? For challenging Harry Reid's use of a SCHIP expansion poster family, the Frosts of Baltimore, last week. Cable TV Bush-basher Keith Olbermann paraded the Frost parents on television and coaxed them into displaying photos of their children in their hospital beds after a horrible car accident while they castigated conservatives for "distraction" techniques. Never mind that the president's veto does not affect families like the Frosts covered by existing policies.
But here's what the hysterical tantrum-throwers really don't want to reckon with: The Frost parents' status as two property-owning, three vehicle-driving, "intermittent" and "part-time" workers raises fundamental policy questions about which families should benefit from government-subsidized health insurance in the first place -- and whether even better-off families than the Frosts should be added to the public health insurance dole.
That's what Harry Reid and his socialized health care minions are telling us. And now they demand that we shut up lest we be accused of "Swiftboating" innocent children.
Are Democrats capable of defending their reckless, inequitable agenda without tot-sized human shields? Apparently not. In advance of the override vote, they simply switched flak jackets and brought out a 2-year-old child with a heart defect, Bethany Wilkerson of Florida, to lobby for the override. But like the Frost children, little Bethany would have been covered regardless of the entitlement expansion veto.
The Democrats may believe their Romper Room politics are working. And some queasy Republicans may be tempted to abandon fiscal conservatism for electoral expediency. But a majority of Americans polled by USA Today/Gallup this week -- 52 percent -- agree with President Bush that most benefits should go to children in families earning less than 200 percent of the federal poverty level -- about $41,000 for a family of four. The polls showed that "only 40 percent say benefits should go to families earning up to $62,000, as the bill written by Democrats and some Republicans would allow."
Defining moment indeed: Who represents the truly needy? Who represents responsible taxpayers? Who represents future generations, who would be forced to send their hard-earned money to fund this hugetastic middle-class entitlement explosion? The GOP is already responsible for passing the obscene Medicare prescription drug entitlement expansion -- the largest in the program's history and the true costs of which were suppressed until after it became law.
If Republicans don't have the guts to torpedo the Democrats' SCHIP Trojan Horse permanently, they deserve to lose their seats.
You know, that deep bass, I'm about to grow a tail in my shorts, suspenseful music that make you feel like dropping a deuce on the spot?!
Cue it up.....
It's about to get nuclear, or is nukelar, or is nuc......
Oh #$% it all....
Just cue the music......
Today, the House of Representatives will vote on a measure to override President Bush's veto of SCHIP (which is a massive government-subsidized health insurance entitlement expansion plan). I agree with the Democrats on one thing: This is indeed a "defining moment."
The left-wing elite is in high dudgeon over conservatives who have dared to question the wisdom of extending SCHIP to middle-class families, adults and even illegal aliens to the tune of $35 billion -- funding dependent on saddling millions of smokers with regressive taxes and maintaining their nicotine addictions.
Liberal columnists have called people like me (as well as way more famous people than me) "meanies and hypocrites" (you know that whole compassionate conservative moniker people like to throw around right now) who are "sliming" children. Even political stalwarts such as Joy Behar took their pot shots to condemn people like me as a "selfish b------." Why? For challenging Harry Reid's use of a SCHIP expansion poster family, the Frosts of Baltimore, last week. Cable TV Bush-basher Keith Olbermann paraded the Frost parents on television and coaxed them into displaying photos of their children in their hospital beds after a horrible car accident while they castigated conservatives for "distraction" techniques. Never mind that the president's veto does not affect families like the Frosts covered by existing policies.
But here's what the hysterical tantrum-throwers really don't want to reckon with: The Frost parents' status as two property-owning, three vehicle-driving, "intermittent" and "part-time" workers raises fundamental policy questions about which families should benefit from government-subsidized health insurance in the first place -- and whether even better-off families than the Frosts should be added to the public health insurance dole.
That's what Harry Reid and his socialized health care minions are telling us. And now they demand that we shut up lest we be accused of "Swiftboating" innocent children.
Are Democrats capable of defending their reckless, inequitable agenda without tot-sized human shields? Apparently not. In advance of the override vote, they simply switched flak jackets and brought out a 2-year-old child with a heart defect, Bethany Wilkerson of Florida, to lobby for the override. But like the Frost children, little Bethany would have been covered regardless of the entitlement expansion veto.
The Democrats may believe their Romper Room politics are working. And some queasy Republicans may be tempted to abandon fiscal conservatism for electoral expediency. But a majority of Americans polled by USA Today/Gallup this week -- 52 percent -- agree with President Bush that most benefits should go to children in families earning less than 200 percent of the federal poverty level -- about $41,000 for a family of four. The polls showed that "only 40 percent say benefits should go to families earning up to $62,000, as the bill written by Democrats and some Republicans would allow."
Defining moment indeed: Who represents the truly needy? Who represents responsible taxpayers? Who represents future generations, who would be forced to send their hard-earned money to fund this hugetastic middle-class entitlement explosion? The GOP is already responsible for passing the obscene Medicare prescription drug entitlement expansion -- the largest in the program's history and the true costs of which were suppressed until after it became law.
If Republicans don't have the guts to torpedo the Democrats' SCHIP Trojan Horse permanently, they deserve to lose their seats.
Paid for by the committee to educate people on the real meaning of Compassionate Conservative.
5 comments:
I'll once again remind you that SCHIP is a program that was invented by Republicans. The current funding levels are not adequate. In other words, private health care is so expensive that some of the children currently enrolled in the program won't be covered without a budgetary expansion of the program.
The Bush media machine have pushed this as a pork program. It isn't. It's a good and necessary program.
Um, I would be interested to know exactly what compassionate conservatism is if it isn't SCHIP.
I AM NOT SAYING KILL THE PROGRAM!!!!
I AM SAYING $35,000,000,000 IS A LOT OF FREAKING MONEY!!!!
WHY DOES A FAMILY MAKING OVER $60,000 (like mine) GET TO BE COVERED UNDER THIS PROGRAM!!!!
WHY AM I TYPING IN ALL CAPS!!!!
THE FLAMING LIBERAL MEDIA MACHINE HAS PUSHED THIS AS "WE MUST DO IT FOR THE KIDS" PROGRAM AND THAT WITHOUT THE WHOLE COUNTRY IS SCREWED!!!!!!
WHY NOT GO WITH THE ORIGINAL $5,000,000,000 INCREASE BUSH PROPOSED?
WHY AM I STILL TYPING IN ALL CAPS!!!!
BECAUSE PEOPLE ARE THINK HEADED!!!!!
COMPASSIONATE CONSERVATISM IS INCREASING THE FUNDING OF A PORK BARREL SOCIAL PROGRAM LIKE SCHIP (COMPASSIONATE) INSTEAD OF LETTING THE FREE MARKET DETERMINE HEALTH CARE BY OPENING UP THE HEALTCARE PROGRAM AND QUIT KEEPING PRIVATE BUT NOT DOING IT WITH $35,000,000,000 (CONSERVATIVE...YOU KNOW THE PART EVERYONE WANTS TO THROW OUT WITH THE TERM COMPASSIONATE CONSERVATIVE)
I'LL QUIT SCREAMING!!!!
Who invented healthcare anyways? What happened to the good old days when they just shoved a stick in your mouth and sawed off your leg?
Handing any program over to the government is generally a bad idea. They've done a GREAT job with Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, the school system, infrastructure...the only thing we're good at is killing people..and until recently the war has been run pretty poorly.
Don't get me wrong, the health care system is in serious trouble, but the answer is NOT to have it subsidized and run by the government.
EXACTLY!!!!!
Post a Comment