Apologizes to Toby

I just commented to one of Sojourners post with a complete and total rant. Probably uncalled for.

I should do something like that here on my blog.

So my apologies Sojourner if the rant was uncalled for. It was just something brewing inside of me, that that post triggered.

It wasn't against Sojourner but just a rant in general of certain things.

If you would like to, you can access Sojourner's site here.

Here is the entry he made into his blog that I was ranting on.

And here is the rant.
*****************************************************

Then where we do we draw the line?

When does the discussion end?

When is their a final say to the conversation?

Is that all life is, just sitting around talking and discussing possible interpretations and meaning?

When does something become dogma?

Why does everybody jump on the "dogma" bandwagon but never classify it?

Is dogma wrong?

How could there be any absolutes if not for dogma?

Isn't the fact that someone classifies something as Dogma, make them guilty
of the exact thing they are talking against?

It is like an atheist making a claim there is no God. They actually,
admit there is a God by making a claim there is no God. They had to
contemplate God's existence before coming thei own conclusion. So there
dogma is there is no God.

When does the madness end?